User talk:NickOWrapperOriginal/Dan and Nick

Kind Request
I've been noticing this in your messages on various talk pages, and I'm wondering why you sign your messages twice – at the end, as per normal, but also in front. It just looks terrible on both the viewing and editing ends, and I sometimes can't tell what you're saying because of the double signature (and I may not be alone on that). As such, I suggest you only sign your replies once, at the end. Thanks for your time. :) -Daniel Benfield (talk) 20:14, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * NickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 20:29, October 26, 2013 (UTC)The reason why is that I can sign it.NickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 20:29, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * ...That...doesn't really answer my question. What you're saying is "The reason why I sign my messages twice – at the end, as per normal, but also in front – is that I can sign it." Are you saying "The reason I sign my posts twice is because I can."? Because all it does is make your messages stand out for the wrong reason, partly due to unnecessary padding. I've never seen anyone sign their messages like this. (Also, I suggest you respond to my messages here so the conversation isn't splintered across two talk pages.) -Daniel Benfield (talk) 20:38, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * NickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 20:41, October 26, 2013 (UTC)yesNickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 20:41, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Two things – one, I specifically suggested that you respond to me here, not on my talk page. Two, I barely saw your reply because it was inside the frickin' double signature. Not like it matters, though, since it's abundantly clear you're doing it because you can. Don't say I didn't try, everybody. -Daniel Benfield (talk) 20:50, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * NickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 20:51, October 26, 2013 (UTC)noNickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 20:51, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Dafuq is this supposed to mean? How about giving something a little more decent than a one-sentence (if even that) reply? How about, heaven forbid, responding on your own talk page? That said, all signs point to trolling, and you're probably ROTFLOLing right now. -Daniel Benfield (talk) 20:58, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * NickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 21:54, October 26, 2013 (UTC)what are you saying what is dafuqlolNickOWrapperOriginal (talk) 21:54, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
 * Pardon my jumping in, but it is apparent to me you a little um... I mean a lot of um... well being that I've been in fights and observing them too and hate starting them and knowing my hatred of them, I can't say it. And furthermore, no offense, but I can see why GSAF never went to your wiki. You wiki is sick.--William Henry Sydnor Jr. (talk) 22:20, October 26, 2013 (UTC)